![]() ![]() This entry was posted in Damages, New York, Trial Practice by Brian Gibbons. Please email Brian Gibbons with any questions. An administrative law judge may be guided but not bound by the provisions of the New. Thanks to Dana Purcaro for her contribution to this post. This decision represents another example of a frustrating pro-plaintiff trend in New York Courts, and should be heeded by attorneys and insurers alike. The Court found that the supplemental bill of particulars alleged damages that were “continuing consequences of injuries suffered and described in the original bill of particulars rather than new, unrelated injuries.” This decision contributes to the uphill battle defendants face when presented with a supplemental bill of particulars with related, yet new, allegations on the eve of trial. ![]() On appeal the Appellate Division overturned the lower court’s decision. The lower court granted the defendant’s motion. Nine years later plaintiff served a supplemental bill of particulars alleging additional injuries and damages of post-traumatic stress disorder and long-term psychotherapy.ĭefendant’s made a motion to strike the supplemental bill of particulars claiming that it alleges new injuries and as such is actually an amended bill of particulars done without leave of court. ANSWER: a) Plaintiff Insert Decedent’s Name died at the Insert Hospital Name in the morning of Insert Time. The date and approximate time of day of each occurrence complained of in this action. Plaintiff initially alleged personal injuries including depression, insomnia, agitation, poor concentration, loneliness and tenseness with distress, stress, and psychological difficulties. for a verified bill of particulars in response to the demand of Defendants, Insert Name(s) of Defendant(s), state as follows: 1. 2017), plaintiff was assaulted by a fellow student while waiting for the bus outside of the school. ![]() Hampton Bays, 2017 Slip Op 05075 (2d Dept. The crux of this issue is whether the new injuries are related to the original injuries as to survive the statutory standard. Pursuant to the CPLR §3043(b), a party may supplement the bill of particulars up to 30 days prior to trial only as to “continuing special damages and disabilities,” they may not allege new and additional injuries. New York State commences with the filing of ' an accusatory instrument. Last minute supplemental bills of particulars are common in personal injury cases and often result in motion practice seeking to strike the new and additional injuries alleged or permit discovery related to them. The Division may direct the filing of a bill of particulars. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |